On this note, how could you edit an existing Reply-To tag instead of appending one using a formail/procmail recipe?
Jeff Graves Customer Support Engineer Image Source, Inc. 10 Mill Street Bellingham, MA 02019 508.966.5200 X31 - Phone 508.966.5170 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony E. Greene Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to configure pine to reply to mailing lists -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:52:32PM -0400, rpjday wrote: > i'm embarrassed to admit that i can't figure out how to get pine >to "properly" respond to mailing lists. That is a limitation of pine, not you. My workaround is to add a few things to the procmail filters for lists that do not use Reply-To: # GnuPG user's list :0 * ^List-Id:.*gnupg-users.gnupg.org { :0f | formail -A 'Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' :0 MailLists/gnupg } I've found that list admins are pretty set in their ideas about whether or not to use Reply-To. You can approach them with the idea, but have your procmail recipe handy; you'll need it. Tony - -- Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05 HomePage: <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/> Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. <http://www.linux.org/> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> iD8DBQE8xfJOpCpg3WyUI50RAsxSAJsFAqXfyaru0quz37DVP4Tyyg4UagCgvwuJ Z+ej5Pqtrt+ETzGZNN01enc= =UZwv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
