I'm not entirely sure what you are asking. > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth1 > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0 eth0 > 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 40 0 0 lo > 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 eth0 > > > In the above output eth1 also has a gateway (192.168.1.1) but it > doesn't show.
why do you say that it does? Are you sure that you don't mean that eth1 has an address of 192.168.1.1 _bound_ to it? If you specify an explicit gateway for a given interface, it will report in netstat -rn (route -v). If what you mean is that eth1 is 192.168.1.1, there is no need for a route statment. An IP address and a subnet are all that is needed to define a network segment. Gateways are only necessary when traversing subnets. If your address was 192.168.1.1 /23 (255.255.252.0), you would be able to ping 192.168.2.1 without a gateway. Again tho, I'm not sure I'm answering the question you are asking :-), if not just repost. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > -- Matthew Boeckman (816) 777-2160 Manager - Systems Integration Saepio Technologies _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
