On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 18:35, Jason Costomiris wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:29:39AM -0400, C. Linus Hicks wrote: > : Using MASQUERADE obviates the need for it, but for completeness, isn't > : it a good idea to answer the question as well? Then he can make up his > : own mind. The wisdom of the list comes from the diversity of the people > : on it. > > Is it not clear that in order to do SNAT, one must supply the address to > NAT to? Since that's the case, and your address is changing, that > sort of obviates the ability to use SNAT, so suggesting MASQUERADE not > only answers the question, but also solves your problem. :)
Perhaps you forgot that I posted a solution for handling the changing address. I disagree that the changing address makes the ability to use SNAT unnecessary, as you stated. It makes it more difficult, but not impossible. Suggesting MASQUERADE answers the question one way. I answered it a different way. There's more than one way to solve a problem. That's what is great about the list. Take what you like and leave the rest. I have no further interest in this discussion. I can't imagine that continuing it will further the interests of the list. ;-) Linus -- redhat-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
