On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 09:51, Benjamin R. Mohilef wrote: > > It is. Prior to posting I did an rpm -v on a set of rpm's constitutng > the entire RH 7.0 i386/686 upgrade directories. Of particular > interest was the kernel, but it verified OK. No missing files > anywhere
I expected to find unsatisfied dependencies, rather than missing files, but that doesn't seem to be the case with your install. > > Since openssl-0.9.5 doesn't /provide/ libssl.so.1, it looks sorta like > > you took a shortcut at some point, and symlinked libssl.so.1 to > > 0.9.5's libssl.so.0. That was bad. The soname was changed because > > they weren't binary compatible. > > Symlinks are created by a script in the rpm, not by the root user. Normally. A while ago a lot of people where spreading around advice to just symlink the new library names to the old ones so that software could run without installing the new libraries. Seemed like a lot of work to avoid a little to me... > Since no one else appears to have this problem, I suspect that it is > something particular to that box. ( Unfortunately, I don't have > another 7.0 box to compare it to. ) I asume that everyone has > reloaded their Apache's and sendmail's after upgrading the > OpenSSL rpm. > > Anyone have any suggestions as to what else could be the > problem? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. The only 7.0 server that I knew of until now was today mostly upgraded to 7.3 using apt. The admin installed the openssl095a, openssl096, and openssl packages from Red Hat Linux 7.3 (errata where appropriate) and the old apache ran fine. Since it's already not working, you can't hurt much by trying to use the very latest packages for the very latest platform. ;) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
