On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:15, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wednesday 25 September 2002 09:41 am, Tom Pollerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:48:14 -0600
> 
> > > >   Are you sure that irq 31 is what you want for eth0? Is that a
> > > >   typo?
> > >
> > >     What's wrong with IRQ 31?  My onboard eepro100 comes up as IRQ
> > >     31.
> >
> >     Never said it was wrong, I was just asking if it wasn't a typo, as
> > it is such an unusual irq value. Somewhere from 1-15 is more the norm,
> 
> I thought 1-15 was all that was physically possible. It is certainly all 
> that is available on my i686 machines.
> 
on smp machines I think things get interesting.  The following is from a
dual pIII compaq 3000


[bhughes@compaq2 bhughes]$ cat /proc/interrupts 
           CPU0       CPU1       
  0: 3255711850          0          XT-PIC  timer
  1:      53673      58854    IO-APIC-edge  keyboard
  2:          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
  8:          1          1    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
 12:     858550     883408    IO-APIC-edge  PS/2 Mouse
 13:          0          0          XT-PIC  fpu
 14:       3713       3636    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
 17:  877476969  891672558   IO-APIC-level  TLAN
 18:   66706589   67858620   IO-APIC-level  ncr53c8xx, ida0
 19:         15         15   IO-APIC-level  ncr53c8xx
NMI:          0
ERR:          0




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to