On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Gary wrote:
<snip>
>
> Personally, I would not use BIND, but rather tinydns, part of the djbdns
> package. It is much more secure, especially when out on the net, and
> given the newest exploits in BIND as recent as a few days ago. Tinydns also
> can handle 5000 quires a second. Its caching server, called dnscache,
> defaults to 1MB, and smoothly discards the older cache, while adding in
> new ones. If you must use BIND which has its own built in cache, there are
> several good tutorials on the net for setting it up. www.google.com/linux/
> can help you there.
>
I have been reading all the documentation with djbdns and it looks
much easier than Bind In the setup instructions it has you add to
users Gtinydns and Gdnslog or these users similar to uucp with no
password and in their own group?
Thanks
Linda
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
