Michael Schwendt wrote:
I haven't installed the errata yet. I just wanted to make sure that this is not an error on Red Hat's side. It is just strange for me to actually get a "downgrade" for a package. This is the first time that Red Hat does this with an official errata.On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:02:52 +0100, Bernd Bartmann wrote:Anyone else noticed that the new xinetd errata from 2002-12-02 has a smaller version number (xinetd-2.3.7-4.7x.i386.rpm) than the old one from 2002-10-14 (xinetd-2.3.9-0.73.i386.rpm)?Do you see any problem?
Newer is not always better.
Sometimes only an older version of software is the easiest or
fastest way to return stability.
--
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Bernd Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SoHaNet Technology GmbH / Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 10-11 / 10553 Berlin
Software / Hardware / Netzwerke * Entwicklung / Verkauf / Wartung
Fon: +49 30 214783-44 / Fax: +49 30 214783-46
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list