NOT 203.57.10.0 hmm...as a matter a fact 203.57.10.0 is just a >subnet not an ip bound to eth0. Why did you do that? It serves no purpose. Ignore that part of my last message. ;) However I am still curious as to why you have it in your routing table. Dan -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gateway Dave Freeman
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gateway Dan Cyr
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gateway Benjamin de los Angeles Jr.
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gatewa... Dave Freeman
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gateway Dan Cyr
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gateway Benjamin de los Angeles Jr.
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gateway Dan Cyr
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gateway Dan Cyr
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gateway Dirk Kleinhesselink
- Re: Auto-Start PPP and Default Gatewa... Dave Freeman
- RH5 and PPP - the 'right' way Dave Freeman
- Re: RH5 and PPP - the 'right'... Jeffrey L. Odell
- Re: RH5 and PPP - the 'r... Gordon VonMiller
- Re: RH5 and PPP - the 'right'... Michael K. Johnson
- Re: RH5 and PPP - the 'r... Dave Freeman
- Re: RH5 and PPP - th... Michael K. Johnson
- Re: RH5 and PPP - the 'right'... hartr
