I'm not throwing in the towel by any means but 5 starts:  1-4.

If anything, it's our pitching that is concerning not our offense which has
been putting up the runs.

Bard and Felix you could attribute a bit to nerves perhaps (1st start and
all) but Lester, Beckett and Buckholtz?  These next 3 games in my opinion
will be telling...


On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Guy gave up five runs, right? In six innings?
>
> Not a disaster but I think decent is generous. I don't quite understand
> the overly high hopes for him (though I admit a few of the strike outs were
> pretty.)
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Ray Daniel Salemi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Not a bad start, but I was hoping for better.  Bard's game score was 44.
>>  Anything below 50 is usually a loss.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> ...but was decent, about what I think we could have expected from a guy
>>> who hasn't started a real game since 2007.... I liked
>>> that we threw almost 100 pitches, although he certainly needs to be more
>>> efficient and spread them over 7 innings, not 5. But
>>> he only walked one, had 6 K's and threw 2/3 of his pitches for strikes.
>>> Between him and Doubrant, I can see having decent
>>> starters for the time being, assuming both will improve but also have
>>> some bumps in the road.
>>>
>>> I do think that Bobby V has over-thunk himself a bit at times. Leaving
>>> Thomas in there to face a rightly with Albers ready was
>>> dumb, as he admitted afterwards. I guess he has some rust to know off
>>> his game as well.
>>>
>>> I'd sure like to see some consistency from the offense, too. Glad Youk
>>> is off the schneid, and Ryan Sweeney has been a
>>> pleasant surprise so far, although it's amazing to see a guy that big
>>> hitting singles. And it seems like Papi is going to
>>> continue to do damage. I did see that Pedroia jammed his shoulder, hope
>>> that doesn't turn into a season-ling thing....
>>>
>>> Dan D
>>> Central NJ USA
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to