Nate Silver makes a good argument that if MVP is really a measure of Most Valuable Player, then Trout should have won:
The Statistical Case Against Cabrera for M.V.P.<http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/the-statistical-case-against-cabrera-for-m-v-p/> On the other hand, I don't think that the MVP should be a purely statistical award such as the Batting Title or the Home Run leader. Winning the triple crown deserves to be recognized. I'm happy with Cabrera. Ray PS. I'm way behind on my geeky baseball stats. I've got to catch up to the new techniques. -- Author of CONFESSIONS OF A GOOD MOTHER and other mystery short stories. Visit Ray Daniel on Amazon <http://www.amazon.com/Ray-Daniel/e/B005OIX4MO/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_pop_1> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
