Isn't, you know, being the Triple Crown Winner in itself recognition? Steve O
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Ray Daniel Salemi < [email protected]> wrote: > Nate Silver makes a good argument that if MVP is really a measure of Most > Valuable Player, then Trout should have won: > > The Statistical Case Against Cabrera for > M.V.P.<http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/the-statistical-case-against-cabrera-for-m-v-p/> > > On the other hand, I don't think that the MVP should be a purely > statistical award such as the Batting Title or the Home Run leader. > > Winning the triple crown deserves to be recognized. I'm happy with > Cabrera. > > Ray > > PS. I'm way behind on my geeky baseball stats. I've got to catch up to > the new techniques. > > > -- > Author of CONFESSIONS OF A GOOD MOTHER and other mystery short stories. > > Visit Ray Daniel on Amazon > <http://www.amazon.com/Ray-Daniel/e/B005OIX4MO/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_pop_1> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Red Sox Citizens" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
