On 11/12/17 5:20 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
We actually do not use DNAME for IDN Variants at DotAsia. IDN Variants are
delegated to the same set of NS as the primary IDN for .Asia. Nevertheless,
its prob good to revisit having a standard IDN Variant provisioning
extension (again) now with the progress in the LGR work...
Edmon
And, just for completeness, .cat does also no longer use DNAME records for the
IDN variants. The inability to use the variant name itself (i.e. without a
subdomain prefix like "www.") always caused confusions both for registrants and
users, so the use of DNAME was abandoned when the registry was migrated to a new
software platform (while this platform still supports DNAME records as an
alternative to duplicated NS records vor variants). It is quite sad that still
no record type exists that combines CNAME and DNAME functionality...
Regards,
Klaus
-----Original Message-----
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephane
Bortzmeyer
Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:00 PM
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [regext] EPP and DNAME records?
[This comes from a discussion in DNSOP about a possible future .internal.]
Some TLD include DNAMEs (for instance .cat and .asia) but apparently only
as
parts of an IDN bundle.
>> [...]
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
