Hi Pawel, Apologies for the delay in responding. My responses are below.
> On 14 Jan 2026, at 5:04 pm, Pawel Kowalik <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 to what Jasdip proposes. > I was made aware of a different issue though. > DENIC happens to allow not only delegation but also provisioning of direct > RRs in the TLD parent zone. MX, A, AAAA or TXT can appear. This would be no > issue though. > What is also allowed is to specify owner name for those RRs, so that A record > for www.example.de would be also possible. This seems not to be covered by > the current draft. > I am not insisting this one case shall be the reason to change the draft, but > rather asking if there is a more general case in this direction or a need in > the draft to be clear that only the delegation case is covered. I don't think a clarification is necessary, since "delegation-only" registries are the overwhelming majority. > [snip] > > "TTL values MUST be unsigned integers in the range 0-2,147,483,647" I suggest > to add " represented as JSON Number", to avoid packing number in string. Thanks, I will look to incorporate this feedback. Cheers, G. -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
