Hi Gavin, From: Andy Newton <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, January 8, 2026 at 9:22 AM To: Jorge Cano <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [regext] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension-03 (Ends 2026-01-19)
On the 3rd paragraph in Section 1: > This document is complementary to the Extensible Provisioning Protocol > [RFC5730] (EPP) > Mapping for DNS Time-to-Live (TTL) Values [RFC9803], but registry operators > do not > need to implement that extension in their EPP server in order to implement > this RDAP extension. It may be worth noting that the data model intentionally does not support a per record TTL. [JS] Andy and I were discussing this. Since RFC 2181 deprecated differing TTLs in an RRSet, it might help to clarify this data model decision by referring to section 5.2 of that RFC [1]. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2181#autoid-9 Jasdip
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
