Yep, sorry, I figured it RIGHT AFTER pressing that damn Send button... :) Sorry again for spammin'... (I just saw Hans, too, making a mistake on this topic, so I can breathe a little easier now... ;-P )
Cheers, Sab ----- Original Message ----- From: "Voicu Liviu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Szabolcs Szasz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 2003. február 28. 13:56 Subject: Re: ReiserFS causes CPU high usage?! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 28 February 2003 14:23, Szabolcs Szasz wrote: > Well, as man nice says: > > "Range goes from -20 (highest priority) to 19 (lowest)." > > So why is that such a surprise that CPU goes up > to the sky? Why else -20 is there for? (Or am I > missing something?) OK :-) Here at home I have P2 300 Mhz ext3 based. If I'll do nice -n -20 some_command_here this will not lock my box :-) really > > Cheers, > Sab > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marc-Christian Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Voicu Liviu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Hans Reiser" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Oleg Drokin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 2003. február 28. 13:13 > Subject: Re: ReiserFS causes CPU high usage?! > > > On Friday 28 February 2003 13:11, Voicu Liviu wrote: > > Hi Voicu, > > > Already using this :-) > > Any way, the system works great but if I change the "nice" value of some > > process then the CPU almost becomes slave of this process......... > > out of sheer curiosity: Why you are nicing emerge to -20?! > > You are using the O(1) scheduler so I see absolute no need to do so. > > ciao, Marc - -- Voicu Liviu Hebrew University of Jerusalem Rothberg International School Assistant Programmer & Network Support -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+X1yDczD4Ii52ssMRAqxHAJ4q/QcrCv7v+aZw3K1zirpPid/weQCfck7F LuF68EtGmeIqu+oaPJ61NYc= =IKJZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----