On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 06:14:19PM +0200, Christophe Saout wrote: > Ok, I see your point. aops. Sorry. > Looking at the code this could be done. The wrappers that dispatch the > operations are really small and call the plugin that is registered with > the inode of the mapping. Instead it could have directly set the > corresponding operations. Right. The wrappers are doing a few things > before calling the plugin. That could be done the other way round too. > But that's more of an implementation issue and could still be changed.
I agree that it's an implementation issue. But it's also a good proof for how Hans tries to ignore all the existing infrastructure for various reasons.
