Hans Reiser writes: > Nikita Danilov wrote: > > > > >Whoever sponsors the benchmark usually wins. Had you forgotten that > > > >mongo setup used by http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html was specially > > > >`tuned' to reach peak reiser4 performance? Remember why you decided to > > > >turn OVERWRITE and MODIFY phases off? > > > What I should have done was what I did with fsync performance. With > fsync performance I told people that we had not yet tuned for it, please > wait a bit and we will tune for it, for now it sucks.
Right, and instead of this you are now claiming that these `benchmarks' show superior reiser4 performance. Moreover, you are doing this aggressively and proposing other people to `eat the dust' over what happened to only exist due to your failing to remember something. As some other notable LKML poster put it `inform yourself before posting'. :-) > > Instead what I did was discuss with Zam at the time how it could be > fixed, leave it off the website until Zam was given a chance to fix it, It wasn't Zam. It was me to begin with. OVERWRITE and MODIFY phases were turned off after switching to large keys. > and then I managed to forget about it. After release one remembers > what all the things that should have been fixed before release were, sigh. > [...] > > I think your characterization of my reasons was unkind and also unfair. What fairness and kindness one expects after styling others as `puppies' in public, and commenting on their hair style in purportedly technical argument? [...] > > Hans Nikita.
