On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:55:19 -0500 David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > > Hello > > > reiser4 depends on several core kernel patches. I think you did not > > apply them. > > What kind of symptoms would not applying them cause? I grab patches > from -mm, but only the ones with "reiser4" in the name. They seem to > work with minimal tweaking on my part, and no one said anything when I > mentioned this before. They do seem solid... > I think Vladimir is talking about the patches to the new inode behaviour. I'm quite sure i checked the 2.6.13-rc4-mm patchlist about the move-fs-to-new-behaviour-* patches etc. but maybe i should re-check that. Currently I'm using 2.6.13-rc6-ck1 + reiser4 from 2.6.13-rc5- mm1 and it works very well. So did -rc5 and -rc4. just wanted to give new RTP patches a try. But i don't want to steal the time of any devs here. It's more important to get reiser4 merged to vanilla than spending time for a guy who plays around with -rc kernels and -mm broken-out patches without even the basic knowledge of C code to understand such compile errors. All i know that it maybe needs a 'select foo' somewhere or something. It misses something... But I'll just wait for stable 2.6.13 + RT and hopefully a reiser4 patch to it (or even r4 in vanilla? :)). If someone had known a quick fix I would have been happy to continue testing around with RT etc, but it's not worth to steal the time of the devs here :) sorry for bugging! regards! tom
pgp1rOJZ2RnqL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
