Hello On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 08:28 +0000, Giovanni A. Orlando wrote: > Hi, > > Looking the http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz article, I > see that > in some cases ReiserFS 3.X is better than Reiser4. > > Correct me if I am wrong. High numbers means poor, more delay. > > Now, because we plan to support both: Reiser3 and Reiser4 in our OS, > we plan to know if there are some system the Reiser3 performance > may become available for Reiser4. > > Reiser4 is superior but seems that with full security enabled logically > the system may delay. > > Basically, my question may be re-posted like: "I know Reiser4 is > different than Reiser3, but may the Reiser4 performance may be superior > all the time, doing some update? >
Unfortunately, currently, reiser4 is not yet superior all the time. There are some bottlenecks we are trying to fix these days.
