Hello David, Saturday, August 5, 2006, 4:55:16 PM, you wrote: > We should really find something better to call them than "plugins", or > we should come up with a standard copy'n'paste statement to refute this. I agree. As Andrew Morton said:
"The plugins appear to be wildly misnamed - they're just an internal abstraction layer which permits later feature additions to be added in a clean and safe manner. Certainly not worth all this fuss." So we're talking about extensibility. How about we call it 'extensions' ? -- Best regards, Maciej
