Hi Edward.

This does indeed sound very good. It would weight much for me, to know how
much my effort have paid off. But I can't allocate more time for anything
strictly needed.

Best
Troels
 On 17 Jun 2014 22:55, "Edward d'Auvergne" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not quite yet ;)  I have to merge this back to trunk.  But first I need to
> see if there is anything to clean up (whitespace, comments, formatting,
> naming consistency, API consistency, etc.).  And then this needs to be
> released to all relax users, either as relax 3.2.3, or as 3.2.4 with 3.2.3
> being reserved for all other trunk changes.
>
> For presenting this, I was thinking of a timing table from you profiling
> scripts.  Do you intend on creating a few more?  Maybe for a numeric model
> were I think there are speed ups, though no where near what you are seeing
> for the analytic models.  I was thinking of witing one master script that
> runs all your profiling scripts, one after the other, then repeating this
> 10 times.  The log would be captured by the script, and then there will be
> timing statistics for each (grepping just for the func_*() target functions
> for a single number to use), so that an average and standard deviation can
> be presented for relax 3.2.2 vs. the new code.  Then in the release
> message, it would look like:
>
> Speed comparison for relax-3.2.2 vs. relax-3.2.3:
>
> Single spin analysis:
> CR72:  3.2+/-0.3 s vs. 2.8+/-0.2 s -> 1.14x faster
> LM63: ...
>
> Cluster of 100 spins:
> CR72:  53.5+/-2.4 s vs. 3.6+/-0.2 s -> 14.9x faster
>
> This would be a great way to strongly present these insane speed ups.
>  What do you think?
>
> Regards,
>
> Edward
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 17 June 2014, Troels E. Linnet <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Update of task #7807 (project relax):
>>
>>         Percent Complete:                      0% => 100%
>>              Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed
>>                   Effort:                    0.00 => 100
>>
>>     _______________________________________________________
>>
>> Follow-up Comment #263:
>>
>> This now complete.
>>
>>     _______________________________________________________
>>
>> Reply to this item at:
>>
>>   <http://gna.org/task/?7807>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>   Message sent via/by Gna!
>>   http://gna.org/
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-devel mailing list
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel

Reply via email to