Hi, I'll look into it, it should only take me a few minutes to script up. I can copy the disp_spin_speed branch scripts directly into the trunk, and they run if I remove the *_orig arguments to the r2eff_*() functions. The reason I asked if you had more plans for the profiling scripts is because you only have the B14, CR72, DPL94, and TSMFK01 models covered.
Regards, Edward On 17 June 2014 23:39, Troels Emtekær Linnet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Edward. > > This does indeed sound very good. It would weight much for me, to know how > much my effort have paid off. But I can't allocate more time for anything > strictly needed. > > Best > Troels > > On 17 Jun 2014 22:55, "Edward d'Auvergne" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Not quite yet ;) I have to merge this back to trunk. But first I need to >> see if there is anything to clean up (whitespace, comments, formatting, >> naming consistency, API consistency, etc.). And then this needs to be >> released to all relax users, either as relax 3.2.3, or as 3.2.4 with 3.2.3 >> being reserved for all other trunk changes. >> >> For presenting this, I was thinking of a timing table from you profiling >> scripts. Do you intend on creating a few more? Maybe for a numeric model >> were I think there are speed ups, though no where near what you are seeing >> for the analytic models. I was thinking of witing one master script that >> runs all your profiling scripts, one after the other, then repeating this 10 >> times. The log would be captured by the script, and then there will be >> timing statistics for each (grepping just for the func_*() target functions >> for a single number to use), so that an average and standard deviation can >> be presented for relax 3.2.2 vs. the new code. Then in the release message, >> it would look like: >> >> Speed comparison for relax-3.2.2 vs. relax-3.2.3: >> >> Single spin analysis: >> CR72: 3.2+/-0.3 s vs. 2.8+/-0.2 s -> 1.14x faster >> LM63: ... >> >> Cluster of 100 spins: >> CR72: 53.5+/-2.4 s vs. 3.6+/-0.2 s -> 14.9x faster >> >> This would be a great way to strongly present these insane speed ups. >> What do you think? >> >> Regards, >> >> Edward >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, 17 June 2014, Troels E. Linnet >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Update of task #7807 (project relax): >>> >>> Percent Complete: 0% => 100% >>> Open/Closed: Open => Closed >>> Effort: 0.00 => 100 >>> >>> _______________________________________________________ >>> >>> Follow-up Comment #263: >>> >>> This now complete. >>> >>> _______________________________________________________ >>> >>> Reply to this item at: >>> >>> <http://gna.org/task/?7807> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Message sent via/by Gna! >>> http://gna.org/ >>> > _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
