On Thursday 13 December 2007 18:25:16 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > After 4.1, we should probably experiment with the 6 month release > > schedule that seems to be working for other projects, > > for certain values of "working". for at least one major project, there > was an immediate and noticeable decline in both mailing list traffic and > commit rates when a 6 month cycle was adopted.
I would expect that when more developers start to become comfortable with distributed srm systems (like git) this starts to be easier and we can avoid such problems. Therefor I think we should let the progress of people pushing their stuff into repos, as they want, drive the strictness of our release schedule. And vice versa. In other words; let people get comfortable with the techniques and technology to enable this much easier at a similar pace as we move to more strict time-based releases. -- Thomas Zander
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
