On Wednesday 13 February 2008 14:43:05 Torsten Rahn wrote: > I mostly agree with Dirk. > > Personally I think that the current proposed schedule is unrealistic in > terms of timescales. Having 2.5 months between an Alpha Release and a Final > Release simply won't work. > > I'd suggest to have an Alpha Release in March, the first Beta at the end > of April, the second Beta at the end of May and the Release Candidate at > the end of June / begin of July. This would make sure that people get into > release mode early again (otherwise we'll have too many construction sites > still two months before the actual release). > > I think that the points of times for freezes and their definitions as > suggested by Matt are quite good actually. I just feel that people won't > get into release mode this fast, so we need to have a "real" alpha release > in March first (and basically call your Alpha1 a Beta 1, etc.).
My impression (and the one of other, I gathered that from past discussions) is that two months to stabilise a 4.x release should really be enough. More time in freeze is not a good thing. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team