Op woensdag 20 februari 2008 05:13 schreef u: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:47:30PM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > > > > > My impression (and the one of other, I gathered that from past > > > discussions) > > > is that two months to stabilise a 4.x release should really be enough. > > > More > > > time in freeze is not a good thing. > > > > I disagree. 2 months is not enough. you need one month alone to tell the > > developers that it is time to head up for a release and at least another > > month to iron out the bugs. > > > > But then again, I'm not the one who wants to release so early, I want to > > release at a later point anyway (to be in sync with other releases of big > > projects). > > > > Greetings, > > Dirk > > > > Just for the record, I actually prefer September myself, but I'm just > the messenger in this case. If we can come to a different consensus on > when we actually want to release, then I (or somebody else) can update > the schedule.
No, we decided for July and announced that everywhere. The objections should have raised during that discussion. If you were on vacation, bad luck this time ;-) That does not mean we can not change anything in the future anymore. When we make the schedule for 4.2, we can shift two months /if/ there is concensus on that idea. I do not see an urgent reason to change the schedule for 4.1.... And, just for the record, I don't like the idea of making sure 4.1 slips two months to get to that schedule. -- Tom Albers
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team