On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 00:07:55 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: >> I'm a Debian developer myself and part of the Qt-KDE packaging team. I >> know the implications of code in packaging. This patch has absolutely >> zero implications. > > He was referring to "make it a standalone library and add it as dependency".
I'll repeat my question: how does that change anything? We'd be making the implementation of this more convoluted just for the sake of working around a non-technical problem. I can't see the point. > Note that even this case should not change anything WRT packaging, since we > promised to re-assemble tarballs for packagers. > > I personally don't mind a non-intrusive patch (one that just changes the text > in there, for example), if the translation and docs team is OK with that. This > does not constitute a new feature to me. Sorry but I don't understand. What text do you want to change and where is "in there"? > I'd suggest dropping everything in this patch that isn't strictly necessary. Could you point me to the bits that you think aren't strictly necessary? Because I don't see any. But maybe it's my not understanding what Allen and you mean. -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
