> On July 30, 2012, 6:07 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > What's the outcome for 4.9.0 if we do not get this in?
Nothing drastic. Internal database stuff. Makes very little difference if it goes into 4.9 or 4.9.1 or 4.10. Nothing user visible. I currently handle both cases in the user interface. - Vishesh ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105744/#review16669 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 27, 2012, 9:54 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105744/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 27, 2012, 9:54 a.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk, Release Team and Sebastian Trueg. > > > Description > ------- > > The old icons will eventually be merged when I make the data migration > application for Nepomuk. > > This needs to go both in kdelibs and nepomuk-core. > > > Diffs > ----- > > nepomuk/core/resource.cpp eba3cea > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105744/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Vishesh Handa > >
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
