> On July 30, 2012, 6:07 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > What's the outcome for 4.9.0 if we do not get this in? > > Vishesh Handa wrote: > Nothing drastic. Internal database stuff. Makes very little difference if > it goes into 4.9 or 4.9.1 or 4.10. > > Nothing user visible. I currently handle both cases in the user interface.
If it does not make any huge difference, let's get it into 4.9.1 then, the less changes we made to pre-release tarballs the better (If you agree please mark this as submitted so it disappears from the release-team queue and commit it after we release on wednesday) - Albert ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105744/#review16669 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 27, 2012, 9:54 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105744/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 27, 2012, 9:54 a.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk, Release Team and Sebastian Trueg. > > > Description > ------- > > The old icons will eventually be merged when I make the data migration > application for Nepomuk. > > This needs to go both in kdelibs and nepomuk-core. > > > Diffs > ----- > > nepomuk/core/resource.cpp eba3cea > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105744/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Vishesh Handa > >
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team