Hmm. Science does provide lots of information about origins and about how processes began. Except for the answer to "Why is there anything instead of nothing?" We can't yet look behind the big bang. But we understand chemistry pretty well. And how it "began". And we understand aspects of life and how it began - albeit with a lot more hypothesis and less proof than in the case of chemistry. It is wrong to say "no scientific information, however, exists about how these processes began." Scientific information is not the same as scientific proof or irrefutable proof. But we know a lot more than nothing.

Steve

On Tuesday, March 16, 2004, at 10:41 AM, Gibbens, Daniel G. wrote:
Specifically, science has provided reliable information about the processes and development of the physical universe and life within it.  No scientific information, however, exists about how these processes began….  Specifically, the science curricula must include clear communication that science provides no information about these origins.  This is true regardless of whether schools teach creationism or intelligent design elsewhere in the nonscience curricula.”   55 Okla.L.Rev. 613 (2002).

Dan Gibbens
University of Oklahoma College of Law
--
Prof. Steven D. Jamar vox: 202-806-8017
Howard University School of Law fax: 202-806-8428
2900 Van Ness Street NW mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Washington, DC 20008 http://www.law.howard.edu/faculty/pages/jamar

"A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged, it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the circumstances and the time in which it is used."

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Towne v. Eisner, 245 U.S. 418, 425 (1918)


_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Reply via email to