----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Dougherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Law & Religion issues for Law Academics" <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>; "Law & Religion issues for Law Academics" <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: Ten Commandments
>I hesitate to ask this, but does anyone on the list genuinely think that >either of the displays in these cases is constututional?
Marty:
Do you mean are they constitutional, or will they pass muster with the current Court's understanding of what is consitutional? Those can be very different questions. And there is (at least) a third option: they don't pass muster, but somehow will be read to do so for this case(s).
Richard Doughery
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
