Re: Ten Commandments

[Ed Darrell]

What federal building in Washington has something that would need to be sandblasted off?  I spent a decade looking, and didn't find anything. 

 

Ed Darrell

Dallas (now)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 3/1/2005 6:26:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I hesitate to ask this, but does anyone on the list genuinely think that either of the displays in these cases is constututional?

Of course both displays are constitutional.

 

After listening to oral argument, I think that you can expect a 4-1-4 (or 3/1-1-3/1) decision sustaining the displays in both cases.

 

To hedge my bet, however, I am buying stock in a DC area sandblasting firm that is bidding on a contract to sanitize the Supreme Court, the Capitol and hundreds and hundreds of federal buildings in the area and around the Nation.

 

Jim Henderson

Senior Counsel

ACLJ

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.