I agree with Rick completely that free speech has costs and that democrats must endure (even embrace?) these costs.  But that says nothing about the wisdom of conveying one's message in a particular manner.  What's the difference between a Christian who believes in proselytizing by virtual confrontational interactions and one who believes in proselytizing by example? A great deal I suspect.  Further, the costs of free speech must be borne by any democrat. But given the different ways of proselytizing, the first Christian should not be surprised when his or her conducts engenders resentment and sometimes even anger. And free speech, of course, guarantees the proper _expression_ of that resentment
and anger. In my view, a rapprochement seem eminently desirable here, but alas probably unavailable.
 
        Finally, I cannot see how one takes another individaul seriously as a person by insisting--even politiely and lovingly--that the individual's core identity is wrong and should be changed. Eugene might be correct that it is misleading to call this Anti-Semitism or Anti-Jewish, but neverthless is a cause for offense. Believe what you will about my future, but respect my beliefs and values, as an autonomous adult, to refrain from expressing your certainty about my damnation. Do you have a right to esxpress what to me are offensive views about my religion? Of course you do. Indeed, I would fight for your right to do so. At the same time, I'd ask you to consider that the right to express your views doesn't entail the wisdom to do so in our constitutional culture.
 
Bobby 
 
Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to