In a message dated 8/6/08 9:44:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I do not believe there is a precedent that is analogous involving underage
> sex and/or polygamy.
>
>
I assume there's not a case on point, but what does that matter when there's
a statute on point?
**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget?
Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017
)
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
