The american jewish congress also filed a statement opposing the bill. Unfortunately we were not paid for our efforts either_and we could use the money Marc stern
----- Original Message ----- From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu <religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu> To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu> Sent: Thu Mar 12 14:51:09 2009 Subject: Connecticut bill The bishops have their own lawyers. They did not commission the law professor's letter, and no one but the signers had any input into its content. Marci, even you agree that this bill was "plainly unconstitutional," so it did not take a conspiracy of bishops to get me to say so. If the real question is whether anyone was paid to write that letter, the answer is no. Not a penny. I had no client that I could have billed, and even if I did, I do not bill commercial rates to clients on public interest matters. Usually, I do not bill public interest clients at all. Many people who saw the bill thought it was obviously unconstitutional, and they began turning for help in all directions. I heard about it from Catholic lawyers, Protestant lawyers, two different list serves, and a Professor at at the Yale Law School. No doubt the Connecticut bishops were encouraging their representatives to spread the word and seek help, and there may well be a chain of communications that leads back to the bishops. But I cannot reconstruct that chain, they did not contact me directly, and no one in Connecticut answered my e-mail when I tried to ask a question about one of the details in the bill. As far as I know, they had never heard of me and had other communications that seemed more important to attend to. The idea to circulate a draft for additional signatures was my own. Many of the people I sent it to already knew about it; some heard about it from me. Quoting hamilto...@aol.com: > I would like to ask a point of information on the law profs letter to > Conn legis. I am wondering if it was formally or informally > commissioned by the bishops. > Marci > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Marc Stern" <mst...@ajcongress.org> > > Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:21:28 > To: <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu> > Subject: Re: NY Religious Corporations Law > > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can > (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others. > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can > (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others. > > > Douglas Laycock Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law University of Michigan Law School 625 S. State St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215 734-647-9713
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
