It is always good to read things before commenting on them. The court
ruling was indeed in a Muslim case.
In Germany there is a law protecting animals ("Tierschutzgesetz") but
there is an exception for Halal slaughtering. "Religious freedom" is a
fundamental right under the German constitution (Art. 4 Grundgesetz). It
would perhaps be wise to read the German constitution and the relevant
laws before speculating about "German history" and courts that are biassed
and "attack religious minorites". I am a bit disappointed about the level
of this debate. In the end we are talking about a liberal democracy,
aren't we?
Manfred Brocker


On Sun, July 1, 2012 6:30 pm, Paul Finkelman wrote:
> I posted this before I had a chance to read the decision, which I now see
> is about a Muslim case; that undermines some of my arguments, but not all
> of them.  The politics may be less about Jews than Muslims but the issue
> remains the same -- a fundamental attack on religious minorities.  I
> wonder, for example, whether the next step will be a ban on Kosher or
> Halal slaughtering on the grounds that it is "cruel" to animals? The case
> does not seem to be based on the place of the circumcision.  That is one
> could imagine a law that requires it to be done in a hospital. But this
> does not appear to be the issue here. 
>
>  
> ----
> Paul Finkelman
> President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law
> Albany Law School
> 80 New Scotland Avenue
> Albany, NY  12208
>
>
> 518-445-3386 (p)
> 518-445-3363 (f)
>
>
> paul.finkel...@albanylaw.edu
>
>
> www.paulfinkelman.com
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Paul Finkelman <paul.finkel...@yahoo.com>
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2012 12:21 PM
> Subject: Re: German circumcision decision
>
>
> Are they also banning parents from piercing the ears of children? In many
> cultures it is common to see infant girls with pierced ears.   Does the
> ban extend to pierced ears before age 18?  And then there is body
> piercing before age 18.  Is that being banned?  Has the Court banned
> tattoos for people under 18?
>
> And has this ban spread to Muslim male children, who are circumcised at
> age 7, 10 or slightly later depending on the sect. 
>
>
> The fact is, given Germany's history of how it has dealt with Jews, is is
> not illegitimate to wonder what the Court is thinking.   Germany has one
> of the fastest growing Jewish populations in the world -- mostly through
> immigration.  This decision, if enforced all over the country, would slow
> down or stop that population growth.  One might at least ponder why this
> case has come to the Germany court, and not one involving piercing,
> tattoos, or Muslim circumcision.
>
>  
> ----
> Paul Finkelman
> President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law
> Albany Law School
> 80 New Scotland Avenue
> Albany, NY  12208
>
>
> 518-445-3386 (p)
> 518-445-3363 (f)
>
>
> paul.finkel...@albanylaw.edu
>
>
> www.paulfinkelman.com
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: "Volokh, Eugene" <vol...@law.ucla.edu>
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2012 11:56 AM
> Subject: RE: German circumcision decision
>
>
>                 Any chance we could have some helpful
> analysis of the decision, rather than one-liners?  The question of the
> degree to which parents should be able to permanently alter their
> children’s bodies – for religious reasons or otherwise – is not, it
> seems to me, one that has a completely obvious answer one way or the
> other.  There may indeed be one correct answer that can be demonstrated,
> but such demonstration requires argument rather than assertion.
>  
>                 Eugene
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to
> others._______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.


-- 
Prof. Dr. Dr. Manfred Brocker, M.A., Dipl. Volksw.
Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
Vizepräsident für Forschung und wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs

Lehrstuhl für Politikwissenschaft II: Politische Theorie und Philosophie
Universitätsallee 1
85071 Eichstätt
Tel.: 08421-93-1498 (Sekretariat)
manfred.broc...@ku-eichstaett.de

http://www.ku-eichstaett.de/ggf/politikwissenschaft/politikwissenschaft2/aktuelles/

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to