The Rutherford Institute says that it has obtained a TRO protecting a student 
who refused to wear a badge with an RFID (radio frequency identification) chip 
that would allow the school to determine her location at all times on school 
grounds. See 
https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/victory_court_grants_rutherford_institute_request_to_stop_texas_school_from.
 The application for a TRO is here:  
https://www.rutherford.org/files_images/general/11-21-2012_TRO-Petition_Hernandez.pdf.

Apparently the student considers the wearing of the badge to be a kind of 
idolatry or act of submission to a false god. She was offered the option of 
wearing a badge with the chip removed, but she refused, because wearing it 
would signal her approval of or participation in the program, which raises both 
free exercise and compelled speech issues. There are other issues, as well, 
including a claim that the school prohibited her from passing out flyers on 
school grounds opposing the RFID program.

The Rutherford Institute describes the RFID program as a preparation of 
students for a society in which everyone is constantly under surveillance, but 
they also note that the school district hopes to get more funding by improving 
attendance.

I thought this was going to be about the "mark of the beast" from the Book of 
Revelation. The story and the application for a TRO don't seem to be that 
specific on the source of her religious objection. I think she also claims that 
the program violates her right to privacy and that the requirement that she 
wear a badge (even without the chip) to indicate support for the program is a 
form of compelled speech.

I haven't anything on this story in the mainstream press. Perhaps someone on 
the list knows more or can provide links to news stories.

Mark S. Scarberry
Professor of Law
Pepperdine Univ. School of Law


_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to