FWIW, I don't think this is an easy case nor one that our legal doctrine or structures handles well. I think the best way for a photographer to handle this is just to refuse for no reason. That is not the same as doing it for an illegal reason. I am not satisfied that that is a good solution -- but it may be the best solution.
Anyone have a principled, workable solution that functionally distinguishes between religious-based beliefs that racial intermarriage is wrong and that same-sex marriage is wrong? Steve -- Prof. Steven D. Jamar vox: 202-806-8017 Director of International Programs, Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice http://iipsj.org Howard University School of Law fax: 202-806-8567 http://iipsj.com/SDJ/ "No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings." William Blake
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
