The government's brief in *Little Sisters*: http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/01/government-bref-in-little-sisters.html
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Marty Lederman <lederman.ma...@gmail.com>wrote: > Another post, this one about the nonprofit cases that have now wound their > way to the Court . . . > > > http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/01/not-quite-hobby-lobby-nonprofit-cases.html > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Marty Lederman > <lederman.ma...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Since no one else has mentioned it, I will: >> >> Eugene recently published a remarkable series of posts on the case -- so >> much there that virtually everyone on this listserv is sure to agree with >> some arguments and disagree with others. It's an amazing public service, >> whatever one thinks of the merits. He and I turned the posts into a >> single, 53-page (single-spaced!) Word document for your convenience: >> >> www.volokh.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/hobbylobby.docx >> >> I've just started my own series of posts on the case on Balkinization -- >> links to the first three below. The second is about the thorny >> contraception/"abortifacient" issue (nominally) in play in the two cases >> the Court granted. In the third post, I endeavor to explain that the case >> is fundamentally different from what all the courts and plaintiffs (and >> press) have assumed, because there is in fact no "employer mandate" to >> provide contraception coverage. >> >> http://balkin.blogspot.com/2013/12/hobby-lobby-part-i-framing-issues.html >> >> >> http://balkin.blogspot.com/2013/12/hobby-lobby-part-ii-whats-it-all-about.html >> >> >> http://balkin.blogspot.com/2013/12/hobby-lobby-part-iiitheres-no-employer.html >> >> Thanks to those of you who have already offered very useful provocations >> and arguments on-list; I'd welcome further reactions, of course. >> > >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
