Would you say the Federal RFRA is egregious, Marci?
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Marci Hamilton <hamilto...@aol.com> wrote: > I have read them and both are egregious. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 25, 2014, at 6:15 PM, "Scarberry, Mark" < > mark.scarbe...@pepperdine.edu> wrote: > > The Arizona bill and the Kansas bill are very different. I don't have time > right now to discuss this further, but all you have to do is to read the > bills. If you do, you will see that the arguments equating the two are > simply and egregiously wrong. I hope no one will comment in any strong way > without actually reading them. > > > > Mark > > > > Mark S. Scarberry > > Professor of Law > > Pepperdine Univ. School of Law > > > > > > > > *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [ > mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu<religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>] > *On Behalf Of *Greg Hamilton > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2014 1:55 PM > *To:* mich...@californialaw.org; Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > *Subject:* RE: Subject: Re: Kansas/Arizona statutes protecting for-profit > businesses > > > > ...and Alan has been championing this bill on the spot at the Arizona > capitol. Sigh. I have fought him over it when he tried to push me into > supporting the Idaho bill which was just as egregious as the Arizona bill, > but perhaps more targeted. > > > > Gregory W. Hamilton, President > > Northwest Religious Liberty Association > > 5709 N. 20th Street > > Ridgefield, WA 98642 > > Office: (360) 857-7040 > > Website: www.nrla.com > > > > <image001.jpg> <http://www.nrla.com/> > > > > *Championing Religious Freedom and Human Rights for All People of Faith* > > > > *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [ > mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu<religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>] > *On Behalf Of *Michael Peabody > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2014 1:38 PM > *To:* religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > *Subject:* Subject: Re: Kansas/Arizona statutes protecting for-profit > businesses > > > > After reading the legislation, it's amazing how broadly it is drafted. It > would seem to not only include permitting discrimination on the basis of > sexual orientation or marital status, but also on the basis of religion. > It would make it very easy for any business with a religious inkling to > refuse to accommodate the religious exercise of employees, or even > terminate them on the basis of religious differences. > > > > The Hobby Lobby case may go a long way in showing what rights employers > have, and it seems to be part of a general strike against the application > of the Bill of Rights to the states (14th Amendment). > > > > Any time the principle argument in favor of a potentially dangerous law > is, "What's the worse that can happen?" I think there's reason to get > really nervous. > > > > There is probably an answer for those who don't want to violate their > religious conscience by accommodating those members of protected classes > that disagree with them, but this legislation is not it. > > > > Michael D. Peabody, Esq. > > Editor > > ReligiousLiberty.TV > > http://www.religiousliberty.tv > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. > > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. > -- Michael Worley BYU Law School, Class of 2014
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
