Sandy,
Normatively, I do think that when the risk to the health of a child is grave and imminent, the state can and should intervene and require treatment. Perry On 02/01/2015 11:31 pm, Levinson, Sanford V wrote: > I'm still not certain what Perry's position is re the Jehovah's Witness children, where the adverse consequences are "internalized" to the child. > > sandy
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
