Why would you think Kenwood is at the low end?
Whole states have found that they (Kenwood Systems)work better and longer
then the so called big boys. The big boys use to make a good repeater in
there time. But it looks like time has passed for some.
73 Russ,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Lemmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood 850 UHF Power level
> Michael,
>
> You pose a crucial question: Which is better, sensitivity or
> selectivity? The Kenwood TKR repeaters are at the low end of
> commercial-quality equipment.
>
> I invested in a Hamtronics UHF repeater, thinking it would be a way to
> obtain a high-quality repeater on a limited budget. Boy, was I wrong!
> Although it met all of its published specifications, I quickly
> discovered that the PA had no circuit to protect and/or regulate its
> power, there was no filter to eliminate the CTCSS tones from the audio,
> no courtesy beep, Morse ID was extra and NOT programmable, no capability
> for CDCSS, etc., etc.
>
> I discovered that a Motorola R1225 transceiver had everything I needed
> in a package that cost about 2/3 that of a Hamtronics repeater. Even
> when you add the $265 for the RSS to program the repeater, you are still
> money ahead, and have many more features and a lot of built-in
> protection.
>
> I will support and defend Hamtronics receivers as being well-built,
> economical, and sensitive, but their products seldom meet the stringent
> requirements of high-quality repeater components.
>
> Perhaps the lesson to be learned here is that light-weight,
> modest-quality equipment will seldom, if ever, perform to the
> expectations of those who require professional-quality performance!
>
> 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
>
> Michael Singewald N1PLH wrote:
> >
> > Considering replacing our UHF Hamtronics rx and tx with the Kenwood
> > TKR850. Two questions (at this point): Can the output be turned down
> > to 7-10 watts in the software; and should I be concerned about a
> > sensitivity rating of .35uv compared to a measured .18uv on the
> > Hamtronics? This is for the same quieting (12db). Or is it safe to
> > assume that in the real world the Hamtronics' sensitivity falls to
> > about .35uv with a stiff level of rf hitting it whereas the Kenwood
> > may hold steady at .35uv?
> >
> > Thanks for the info!
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
