<Uhhh... coordinators DO have the authority to set the terms for which
they will grant (or deny) a coordination.

That is correct, they have the "authority" to set any terms that happen to please them, however, they have no authority, other than denial of "coordination", to prevent anyone from operating without being "coordinated".

<If you say the coordinator has no authority to
require specifications, then what IS a coordination? Answer: It's a set
of operating conditions which must be met in order to get along with
other cochannel and adjacent channel operations. That INCLUDES requiring
CTCSS/CDCSS.

Again, true, however, they have no authority to ENFORCE those requirements.

Coordination only works because the participating parties VOLUNTEER to agree to the terms of the coordination as a means of reducing or eliminating interference. The FCC "suggests" the use of coordinating bodies because it takes the workload off of THEM !!
However, it is the FCC who ultimately has AUTHORITY to decide and the power to ENFORCE those decisions concerning interference whether "coordination" is involved or not.

<The FCC themselves have ruled in favor of repeaters operating
CTCSS/CDCSS when all other factors are equal (both holding
coordinations, operating within their coordinations, etc) when it comes
to interference issues.

See previous comment.

Coordination works when (most) everyone wants to play nice, together. If EVERYONE wanted to get along, then "coordination" would be unnecessary.

My nickel's worth, your mileage may vary.

Kenneth Buley
Bullitt County DES CD-2
Bullitt County Red Cross/Certified ECRVDriver/Operator BC-6
Bullitt County ARES\RACES Coordinator KY4DES










Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to