-----Original Message-----
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil McKie
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters



  Daron, 

  At last report 152.24 MHz is still used by Arch paging but is 
 digital.  You might contact Arch and ask if any analog paging is 
 still used in your area. 

  If you have trouble contacting them, please let me know. 

  Neil - WA6KLA 

JOHN MACKEY wrote:
> 
> Daron-
> 
> Most all your 150 MHz or 900 MHz paging systems are going to be 
> simulcast.  If there are any 150 MHz analog paging systems around, 
> try listening to them.
> 
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Tue, 03 May 2005 01:26:06 AM CDT
> From: "Daron Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
> 
> > Hello Folks,
> >
> > I'm looking over a radio study done by consultants for our small coastal
> > community.  The recommendation includes three simulcast repeaters with
> > voting receivers.  We live on the coast, the terrain is covered with tall
> > trees that make wonderful reflectors and contribute tons of multipath when
> > wet, and it rains plenty.  I can't think of any place with terrain issues
> > where I have seen a simulcast VHF repeater system built out.
> >
> > If you have any references (for or against) a simulcast system like this,
> > please drop me a note.  I suspect a fair amount of multipath problems and
> > not real great audio for the mobile units based on their location, but I
> > wouldn't be able to prove it until the thing got installed.
> >
> > Ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Daron
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Bade
> > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 7:56 AM
> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] I'm stunned...
> >
> >          It uses what looks like a JFET type VCO oscillator running with a
> > dc controlled/varicap pll on board. I used it to replace a 17.6125
> > reference oscillator on a synthesized 900 station. The output is multiplied
> 
> > in this case and used to sync lock a free running 70.45 RX L.O injection
> > oscillator and  is the clock reference for the TX exciter PLL. I used an
> > outboard 10 mhz ovenized oscillator to set it up and it was tuned up as a
> > special from the vendor on our requested freq.
> >
> >          It is likely not 2ppm itself, but in a stable environment it may
> > be ok without an ovenized reference. It can use about any reference that is
> 
> > compatible with the programming. It has no mod port as it is more designed
> > to replace a crystal than replace the channel element. The RX performance
> > of the station after the mod was slightly lower with this unit as opposed
> > to my service monitor generating the 17.6125 in other tests. I guess that
> > means it does exhibit some sideband noise which influenced operation but
> > the spec sheet and printouts that come with it indicate pretty decent
> > specs.. at least for a pll/vco.
> >
> >          Not an answer for all but a very interesting development for ham
> > use etc.... maybe an answer for some.. It also only does 1 freq at a
> time...
> >
> > Doug
> > KD8B
> >
> >
> > At 07:14 PM 4/28/2005, you wrote:
> > >Certainly would be nice to put one through it's paces on a repeater.
> > >Checking it for temperature stability and purity, etc. Obviously someone
> > >would need to have some decent test equipment to conduct the testing.
> > >
> > >Chuck
> > >WB2EDV
> >

ONCE MORE INTO THE BREACH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IF YOU'RE READING THIS, YOU PROBABLY DON'T HAVE MUCH TO DO, COMPARED TO THOSE 
WHO ARE SO BUSY THEY CAN'T EVEN TAKE THE TIME TO RENAME THE SUBJECT LINE OR TO 
CROP OFF THE HALF-DOZEN OR SO REPLIES AND REPLIES TO THE REPLIES, OR (LIKE ME) 
SIMPLY LIKE TO FIND WAYS TO IRRITATE THE GENERAL PUBLIC. THIS IS OFF-TOPIC, BY 
THE WAY. REPLY, IF YOU LIKE, AS I OBVIOUSLY DON'T HAVE A LIFE OF MY OWN. HAVE A 
DIFFERENT DAY.

Kenneth Buley
Bullitt County EMA Deputy Director CD-2
Bullitt/Spencer Counties Red Cross ECRV Driver/Operator BC-6
Bullitt County ARES/RACES Coordinator KY4DES 



 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to