Slightly ...
Neil
Chuck Kelsey wrote:
>
> That was my thought. But he missed April 1st.
>
> Chuck
>
> Al Wolfe wrote:
> > I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it?
> >
> > 73,
> > Al, K9SI
> >
> >
> > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -0000
> > From: "us_communications1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject:
> > Re: trying to build my first repeater
> >
> >
> > the fact that they are mobiles and the design of the power supply
> > make little difference an any piece of equipment can be re-engineered
> > to perform a needed task. all that is needed is time and ability.
> > simultaneous transmit and receive will be addressed by seperate
> > antennas.
> >
> > WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS. the radios
> > are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the first to think of
> > using the higer quality tube equipment. this equipment is very
> > expensive and i was fortunate to have it donated to the non-profit
> > group i am working with.
> >
> >
> >
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
