Slightly ... Neil
Chuck Kelsey wrote: > > That was my thought. But he missed April 1st. > > Chuck > > Al Wolfe wrote: > > I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it? > > > > 73, > > Al, K9SI > > > > > > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -0000 > > From: "us_communications1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Subject: > > Re: trying to build my first repeater > > > > > > the fact that they are mobiles and the design of the power supply > > make little difference an any piece of equipment can be re-engineered > > to perform a needed task. all that is needed is time and ability. > > simultaneous transmit and receive will be addressed by seperate > > antennas. > > > > WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS. the radios > > are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the first to think of > > using the higer quality tube equipment. this equipment is very > > expensive and i was fortunate to have it donated to the non-profit > > group i am working with. > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/