Would I gain any advantage by changing out my Motorola MICOR Repeater TPN1110B 
supplies (the ones with the constant-voltage transformer) to the TPN1151A 
Switching power supply? I have a few spares of each type, but most of my MICOR 
Repeaters came with the 1110B supply installed. 

I don't know why there were two types of supplies offered with the MICOR 
Repeater/Base Station radios. The switching supplies seem to be very quiet 
(even around an HF radio), as far as I have been able to determine. Some of the 
MICOR service manuals have sections for both supplies, to cover the particular 
unit that was supplied with the user's station.

LJ

-----Original Message-----
>From: skipp025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jan 14, 2007 9:09 AM
>To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Switching Power Supply vs. Astron Etc.
>
>
>> If the supply you are using is fine why change?  Yes, you 
>> would gain some amperage capacity. 
>
>Relative example... 
>A room full of Motorola Repeater Stations in non constant 
>service costs about $30/month each to operate. Put the repeater 
>into lock to talk mode (IRLP or Echolink) and the energy cost 
>rises by almost a third (typical). 
>
>One of the energy soaks is the well designed and constructed 
>transformers within the repeater power supplies. 
>
>Replacing the hungry Motorhead Power Supplies cuts at least 
>1/2 off the power bill, which is much nicer when you're the one 
>having to pay it. 
>
>> However, switching supplies are inherently noisy. You 
>> could experience problems from these noises. I realize 
>> we are not talking about HF. But, it is possible to wind 
>> up with a problem you don't have now. 
>
>Many of the common 13.8 vdc switchers sold to the ham market 
>will hose up at least the 160 meter ham band no problem, which 
>is just above the am broadcast band I have on the shop when 
>XM is stale. 
>
>> If that 50 amp supply is fine, I see no advantage in the change.
>> Dave 
>
>Cheers Dave, 
>skipp 
>
>

Reply via email to