* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Jan 14 11:33 -0600]:
> I also have a 220 Isopole but no data sheet. Never needed it,
> though. AFAIK the upper decoupling cone mounts at the top of the mast near
> the feedpoint, & the 2nd cone mounts at the bottom of the 1st. Then again,
> maybe I'm wrong & that's why that antenna never worked worth a darn.
As I recall (been a long time) the upper cone had to be mounted below
the feedpoint a distance about equivalent to the length of the stinger.
The second cone did indeed mount below the first.
Mine was an excellent performer for being an omni antenna.
73, de Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998.
http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of
My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!"
http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org
