I have one of the early model that I use for portable temporary use at 
events.  Not fancy or a whole lot of power, but does a real good job in 
that application. 

I would not want to try to use one in a high RF environment, but for low 
level stuff they are pretty good and the price is right.  
Johnny 

skipp025 wrote:
> Just relative to your post here... 
> 
> If you're playing with a Ritron Repeater of circa 80's 
> vintage... then you probably have one of two types. The first 
> is the black shoe-box model, which at first glance is considered 
> a toy repeater. Under the right conditions the black shoe-box 
> repeater works pretty well for what it is. Model RR-454 and similar 
> nubers. 
> 
> The second model is the silver face unit... looking more like 
> a desk-top radio... can also be a base station and/or repeater 
> or combinations of both. 
> 
> Both of the above repeaters have what I call cigar tube notch 
> type duplexers, which in the right conditions do work fairly 
> well for their intended application. 
> 
> Most stuffy radio folks without much imagination discount these 
> products as toys. When looking at these items with a more flexible 
> and bean counter eye... the reason why there are a lot of these 
> units out there will become obvious. 
> 
> They are much fun to play with... providing you have the right 
> attitude and resources. 
> 
> cheers, 
> s. 
> 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Hi All!
>>  
>> I have a couple of Ritron UHF repeaters here and kind of curious if
>  anyone 
>> has had a chance to screw around with these little job site 
> repeaters.  Anyone 
>> moved them to the ham bands?  For their age, I was  surprised they
> worked, 
>> had clean audio and rated output. New rocks are $21  each from ICM,
> not too bad.
>>  
>> The two I have is a Repeater Plus and a Responder II.  One is at  15
> watts 
>> and the other at 3 watts.  Both do repeat and are PL.
>>  
>> I checked the Ritron website, no info on these guys.  I don't have any  
>> manuals..... oh well!
>>  
>> Yepp, its 70's and 80's tech, but what the heck, the sunspot cycle
> is still  
>> low!
>>  
>> 73, Brian WD9HSY
>>  
>> Before we flame, my repeaters are Micors and I know these are not
> top of  
>> line, but they are not a couple of hundred pounds either!
>>  
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to