My intention was not to provide a resolution, but to point out the responsibility of said resolution does not fall solely on the un dude... So says the FCC rules.
Kevin > True, but what alternative..... > > Kevin Custer wrote: > >> MCH wrote: >> >>> Coordination is not required, but when one repeater is coordinated, and the >>> other is not, >>> *the uncoordinated one must resolve the problem*. That's in Part 97. >>> >> I'll pick on Joe here a minute.... >> >> The rules state that it is *primarily* the responsibility of the >> uncoordinated repeater (owner) to resolve the issue. >> This means that the problem is NOT solely the responsibility of the >> uncoordinated system, but SOME responsibility lies upon the coordinated >> system (owner) to help resolve the issue. >> >> Kevin Custer >> List Owner
