Nate - May I suggest that you do a write-up with photos that could be posted on the RB site? Maybe "the right way" and "the wrong way" would be helpful for guys making installs. And explain why it's done this way, not that way.
Chuck WB2EDV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nate Duehr" <n...@natetech.com> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:28 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Ham installation quality/non-quality > > On Tue, 05 May 2009 12:32:57 -0000, "Louis" <k1...@yahoo.com> said: >> Interesting, this looks like one of those Hams/bash-hams discussions >> that is not suppose to take place on this forum! > > Sometimes you just have to rant when you see something this bad. I > didn't name names, and I didn't attack any individual. > >> Yes, I will agree their are those that cause havoc with a tower site >> owner, or other lessors, but the number is minor compared to those >> Amateur Radio installs that are done properly and well maintained. > > I hope so. From the "proud papa photos" around the Internet, I'd say > it's closer to 50/50, but luckily that ratio gets better at commercial > sites, where my club's gear often lives. > <SNIP>
