Hi Mark,

Good to know and thanks!  I haven't been back to the repeater yet but 
when I get there, I'll make some small adjustments.

Thanks again!

Adam N2ACF

N9WYS wrote:
> Adam...
>
> My experience with a C85GFB is that my squelch also seems a bit "tight", but
> so far I have not been able to do anything about it.  I set it to threshold
> when I had the service monitor on it, and the station was within
> specifications.  
>
> FWIW - I currently have the station set for "AND" squelch, but have been
> told that PL-only squelch may be a bit more "forgiving".  I just haven't had
> an opportunity to get to the tower and change the setting to see for myself
> whether this is true.
>
> Mark - N9WYS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com  On Behalf Of Adam Feuer
>
> Great, thanks James!
>
> Adam N2ACF
>
> James Delancy wrote:
>   
>> Receiver Squelch is just that ... a level at which the local receiver 
>> un-squelches.  The repeater squelch is the level the station uses to 
>> determine (for its own internal controller) when it is actually going to 
>> pass a signal through for repeat.  I would recommend that you just set 
>> both at the same level.   The squelch knob on the front of the SSCB may 
>> also affect your squelch levels depending on where you are deriving your 
>> COR signaling.
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> Adam Feuer wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> After interfacing my C74CXB to an external controller, everything seems 
>>> to be playing real nice.  In scrutinizing received signals, it seems as 
>>> if the the MSF squelch is a little tight and not letting week signals 
>>> become week but rather just squelching them out.
>>>
>>> The receiver is programmed for CTCSS decode so I would like to loosen 
>>> the squelch a little. In the list of available EEpots, there are two 
>>> settings that I'm not totally familiar with:  "Repeater Squelch" and 
>>> "Receiver Squelch". If someone could provide me an explanation of both 
>>> as well as which one I should lower to help my issue, it would be 
>>> greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Adam N2ACF
>>>       
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>   

Reply via email to